Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to establish the construct validity of a new instrument to measure psychological learning processes associated with Team-based learning (TBL), the Knowledge Re-Consolidation Inventory (KRCI). The instrument was designed to measure six factors: (1) self-guided preparation, (2) knowledge consolidation, (3) retrieval practice, (4) peer elaboration, (5) feedback, and (6) transfer of knowledge. Method: Two samples were taken, consisting in total of 197 first- and second-year medical students from Singapore. To establish the construct validity of the KRCI, two confirmatory factor analyses were conducted (CFA). First, an exploration sample (N¼90) was taken from the second-year medical students to conduct a preliminary CFA, and it resulted in elimination of items with poor psychometric properties. A confirmatory sample (N¼107) was then taken from the first-year medical students to conduct a second CFA to cross-validate the KRCI with reduced items. Results: From the original 38 items, 16 remained. The resulting model fitted the data well. The second CFA with the crossvalidation sample replicated the findings of the first analysis and supported the factorial structure of the hypothesised six-factor model. Tests of factorial invariance demonstrate that the factorial structure of the KRCI was stable across measurements. Discussion: The results of the study suggest that the KRCI is a valid and reliable instrument capable of measuring the six psychological mechanisms underlying TBL
Recommended Citation
Ahn, Hyun Seon; Rotgans, Jerome I.; Rajalingam, Preman; Lee, Jian Jia Rebekah; Koh, Ying Yun Juliana; and Low-Beer, Naomi
(2017)
"Assessing How Students Learn in Team-Based Learning: Validation of the Knowledge Re-Consolidation Inventory,"
Health Professions Education: Vol. 3:
Iss.
2, Article 9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpe.2017.10.001
Available at:
https://hpe.researchcommons.org/journal/vol3/iss2/9