Abstract
This short report describes an interactive online diversity workshop for health and welfare professionals and university faculty in Japan. The workshop used Zoom and Mentimeter to support anonymous real-time participation and focused on bias related to poverty, mental illness, and LGBTQ+ issues. Forty-five participants attended; questionnaire completion and feedback submission were voluntary. Seventeen participants provided matched pre-post data and were included in the quantitative analysis. Forty-two post-workshop open-ended feedback comments were collected. The evaluation used the Japanese Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Stigma, Feeling Thermometer ratings, and qualitative content analysis of feedback. Linear mixed model analysis showed a statistically significant favorable change in Feeling Thermometer ratings toward people in poverty and trend-level favorable changes in AAQ-S inflexibility and Feeling Thermometer ratings toward people with mental illness and LGBTQ+ individuals. Qualitative findings suggested that participants recognized bias as something to notice and manage and perceived anonymous peer-response sharing as useful for reflection. The findings suggest possible short-term learner-level changes but do not demonstrate bias-related behavior change or patient-care outcomes.
Recommended Citation
Aoki, Shuntaro; Kobayashi, Tomoyuki; Sato, Hideki; Adachi, Nahoko; Tsuda, Natsumi; Otani, Koji; and Shikama, Yayoi
(2026)
"Interactive Online Diversity Training for Health and Welfare Professionals and University Faculty in Japan.,"
Health Professions Education: Vol. 12:
Iss.
6, Article 1.
DOI: 10.55890/2452-3011.1435
Available at:
https://hpe.researchcommons.org/journal/vol12/iss6/1
I have added my responses to your comments and noted additional corrections in the PDF file.

